Description: |
Since at least the seventeenth century, claims to objectivity
in science have been linked to the presentation of the self as the modest
and humble witness of nature. As Steven Shapin, Simon Shaffer, Donna
Haraway, and others have shown, these affectations defined the role of the
scientist as the "legitimate and authorized ventriloquist for the object
world" (Haraway, 1997: 24). The conflation of modesty and objectivity was,
moreover, a situated concern—linked to the socially regulated space of
the laboratory, where the world was observed in abstract. What, though, of
the geographer, explorer, and traveller who acquired knowledge 'in the
field'? How did (and do) geographers seek to establish the credibility of
such knowledge?
This session seeks to interrogate the epistemological bases of claims to
truth in the context of fieldwork and travel. How is it that geographers
evaluate the relative significance of direct observation, oral and textual
testimonies of informants, and indigenous or 'local' knowledges? How does
knowledge acquired in the field become, through a series of epistemic and
material translations, established as reliable? How is it that the
testimony of travellers, explorers, and geographers in the field continues
to serve as the basis for understandings of 'out-of-the-way' places (Tsing
1993: 27) and, through the published versions of work, establish their
accounts as 'truth'? |
Participants: |
Presenter: |
Jorn Seemann, Searching for the ephemeral in nineteenth-century northeast Brazil: travel accounts, historical maps and other ways of truth-making |
Presenter: |
Innes M. Keighren, Accidental geographers: nineteenth-century British travellers in South America |
Presenter: |
Ruth Craggs, 'The long and dusty road': Travel, contact and knowledge on the Comex expeditions 1965-1973 |
Presenter: |
Ben Wisner, Blending local and outside knowledge of natural hazards: what are the risks of trying a hybrid approach to risk? |
|